Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2002 00:38:17 -0700 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: Jake Burkholder <jake@locore.ca>, FreeBSD current users <current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Seeking OK to commit KSE MIII-again Message-ID: <3CF879E9.19376E10@mindspring.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0205311747320.29361-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Elischer wrote: > interesting but not exactly brief.. :-) Does brevity really matter? You asked "why". I gave a reference in the general class; Jake gave a specific reference for the upcall issues he think the code will face. I think you have enough justification for Jake's position to just accept it, and move on, leaving the hard stuff to Jake. If you really want to press a large structure size for some reason, I think the ball is in your court to prove why larger is better than smaller for x86; it's been proven that it's not, for SPARC, I think. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3CF879E9.19376E10>