From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Apr 9 5:18:36 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from voi.aagh.net (pc1-hart4-0-cust168.mid.cable.ntl.com [62.254.84.168]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE2FC37B416 for ; Tue, 9 Apr 2002 05:18:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freaky by voi.aagh.net with local (Exim 3.35 #1) id 16uua0-000HmY-00 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2002 13:18:32 +0100 Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 13:18:31 +0100 From: Thomas Hurst To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: apache-2.0.28_4 Message-ID: <20020409121831.GB66800@voi.aagh.net> Mail-Followup-To: ports@FreeBSD.org References: <4.3.2.7.2.20020408204545.01c8abb0@nospam.lariat.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20020408204545.01c8abb0@nospam.lariat.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20020408210655.01c91450@nospam.lariat.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20020408210655.01c91450@nospam.lariat.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Organization: Not much. X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/4.5-PRERELEASE (i386) X-Uptime: 1:06PM up 109 days, 20:51, 4 users, load averages: 2.00, 2.00, 2.00 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * Brett Glass (brett@lariat.org) wrote: > At 08:54 PM 4/8/2002, Will Andrews wrote: > > > Uhm.. try updating your ports tree? It was committed 20 hours ago. > > Interesting. > > The FreeBSD Web site still says that the latest port is 2.0.28_4. See > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=Apache&stype=all. The INDEX file that's based on is always horribly out of date. Try http://www.freshports.org/, which lists: apache2 2.0.35 www Version 2 of the extremely popular Apache http server Maintained by: perky@fallin.lv Description : Changes : Download Port : Homepage And tracks each cvs commit to the ports tree. That is, if you don't want to track -STABLE properly and keep an eye on -stable/-ports (and the cvs commits list if you're really serious). > (BTW, we don't keep the ports on our machines because they take up a > great deal of disk space and become obsolete almost instantly. The ports tree is about 60-70MB. I'm sure you can spare that much space on at least one machine. > Our production servers don't run CVSup to avoid instability. cvsup is unstable? Since when? I'm sure sticking with Apache 2.0.28_4 for months longer than you need to (.31 has been out for ages, never mind .35 :) is more unstable than having a recent checkout of the ports tree on at least one machine so you can build packages yourself. -- Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst - freaky@aagh.net - http://www.aagh.net/ - It was one of those perfect summer days -- the sun was shining, a breeze was blowing, the birds were singing, and the lawn mower was broken ... -- James Dent To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message