From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 22:55:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D13C16A403; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:55:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [209.31.154.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6A7443D4C; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:55:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 922AB46D27; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:55:57 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:55:57 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: John Baldwin In-Reply-To: <200609291618.09492.jhb@freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20060929235459.M73166@fledge.watson.org> References: <451ADC21.50206@centtech.com> <200609271727.29775.jhb@freebsd.org> <451D4787.4050309@samsco.org> <200609291618.09492.jhb@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: isofs/cd9660 -> relocate to fs/isofs/cd9660? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:55:59 -0000 On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, John Baldwin wrote: >>>> Btw, this is a topic that is easily searched on, as it gets brought up >>>> fairly regularly. We were a bit late on the schedule this time, though, >>>> so thanks for giving it a kickstart. >>> >>> We've actually moved most of the filesystems into sys/fs in the past. > Only >>> cd9660, nfs, and ufs are in the top-level. I'd still say leave nfs and > ufs >>> alone, but sys/isofs/cd9660 -> sys/fs/cd9660 (I wouldn't keep the extra > isofs >>> directory) probably wouldn't be but so painful at this point. >>> >> >> What about moving all of the net* directories into /sys/net?. And don't >> forget putting i386 and friends into /sys/arch! Ah, I love the smell of >> fresh paint in the morning. Smells like.... napalm. > > Baby steps aren't hard. :) Back when I first made rumblings about this sort > of thing we didn't have a sys/fs at all, but now we do and over time we've > actually moved most of our filesystems into it. :) The great thing about moving all the network subtrees around is how we can break the compile of all the existing applications that include net/*, netinet/*, netinet6/*, etc, all in one pass. :-) Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge