From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 27 18:00:05 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2605916A475 for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:00:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9A0113C4DD for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:00:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id lARI02aG019867 for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:00:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id lARI02m3019866; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:00:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:00:02 GMT Message-Id: <200711271800.lARI02m3019866@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Remko Lodder Cc: Subject: Re: bin/118286: watch(8) allow use up to 10 snp* devices X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Remko Lodder List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:00:05 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/118286; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Remko Lodder To: Mykola Zubach Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/118286: watch(8) allow use up to 10 snp* devices Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:52:53 +0100 Mykola Zubach wrote: > FreeBSD advancedhosters.com 6.2-RELEASE-p8 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p8 #3: Fri Nov 16 12:31:53 UTC 2007 root@advancedhosters.com:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/Z i386 >> Description: > for (c = '0'; c <= '9'; c++) { > This code is self explanatory > > watch(8) do up to 10 tries to find not used /dev/snp*, and then fail > I've rewrite this part so it could use up to 999 snp devices. >> How-To-Repeat: > open 11 watch(8) sessions in parallel So why would we want to open up to 999 snoop sessions? I see this as a tool to assist someone in case of problems, I dont see that many scenarios in which one would do more then 10 sessions at all; unless you are perhaps doing more then just assisting someone but in that case you can easily override it locally. //Remko -- /"\ Best regards, | remko@FreeBSD.org \ / Remko Lodder | remko@EFnet X http://www.evilcoder.org/ | / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News