From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Wed Dec 14 12:04:18 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B12D1C77749; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 12:04:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citapm.icyb.net.ua (citapm.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CC9914A7; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 12:04:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citapm.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id OAA20604; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 14:04:15 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1cH8IA-00024I-Ks; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 14:04:14 +0200 Subject: Re: svn commit: r309714 - head/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs To: Alexander Motin , src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org References: <201612081558.uB8Fw4xA027508@repo.freebsd.org> From: Andriy Gapon Message-ID: Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 14:03:38 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201612081558.uB8Fw4xA027508@repo.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 12:04:18 -0000 On 08/12/2016 17:58, Alexander Motin wrote: > This change switches zio_timestamp_compare() from comparing uninitialized > io_offset to really populated io_bookmark values. I haven't decided yet > what to do with timestampts, but on simple tests this change gives the > same peformance results by just making code to work as declared. I think that we should just enable precise timestamps. I just can't see them noticeably hurting performance given the amount of calculations, memory allocations, locking, etc, that ZFS already has. And there are layers above and below ZFS too. -- Andriy Gapon