From owner-freebsd-current Tue Jan 9 04:43:35 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id EAA06519 for current-outgoing; Tue, 9 Jan 1996 04:43:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id EAA06514 Tue, 9 Jan 1996 04:43:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id EAA29762; Tue, 9 Jan 1996 04:42:57 -0800 To: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth) cc: current@freebsd.org, phk@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Syncing CTM and SNAPS? In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 09 Jan 1996 06:11:56 CST." Date: Tue, 09 Jan 1996 04:42:57 -0800 Message-ID: <29760.821191377@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > If you make a SNAP based on any ctm source, then it is unnecessary to > distribute the source distributions as a part of the SNAP. In fact, this > idea could be extended to the regular release distributions. Well, there's the `subdivision problem' you yourself mention. All the nice menus for picking-and-chosing in the src tree would go away. However, I see no reason why `ctm base' couldn't become an item in the src menu, to supercede the other src options. Now that I've got slightly better dialog menus, I'd planned to add items like `All' and `Clear' to that menu anyway. One more item labeled `CTM Base Delta' won't hurt! I'd assume that there could be a symlink on the ftp site (wherever that might be?) always pointing to the most recent base delta? Jordan