Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 19:42:22 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/natd natd.8 natd.c Message-ID: <73893.1004553742@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 31 Oct 2001 20:21:07 %2B0200." <20011031202106.G91951@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20011031202106.G91951@sunbay.com>, Ruslan Ermilov writes: >Please back this change out, indicated by: ``Requested by: ru''. No. >I don't agree with this change; Well, I agree with this change. >this is not what Flemming submitted. No, I changed it with Flemmings permission. >His patch added the -nolog_ipfw_denied, while you changed this to >-log_ipfw_denied, breaking POLA (the current behavior of natd), >which is BAD, as this message (usually) indicates a misconfigured >firewall. No, Adding negative options breaks POLA. >As the maintainer of natd(8), I would appreciate it if you mailed >me about your intentions to commit this. Your totally unflexible behaviour in the discussion with Flemming (and me) about this change earns you no credit as maintainer. >I re-opened the PR in question, and will look into this soon after >I return from BSDCon/Euro. Lets discuss it at BSDcon/Euro then and leave the tree in peace until then. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?73893.1004553742>