From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 19 13:49:46 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F1D16A4C0 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 13:49:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remt23.cluster1.charter.net (remt23.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.8.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ECA343FA3 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 13:49:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chowse@charter.net) Received: from [66.168.145.25] (HELO moe) by remt23.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.6) with ESMTP id 127668621; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 16:49:44 -0400 From: "Charles Howse" To: "'Jonathan Arnold'" Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 15:49:38 -0500 Message-ID: <001c01c36693$68057680$04fea8c0@moe> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 In-Reply-To: <3F42872B.6050002@buddydog.org> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Make buildworld failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 20:49:46 -0000 > > cd /usr/src > > make buildworld (drat, I should have done make -j4 buildworld!) >=20 > Actually, no, don't do the -j4 - I think that's why it worked. > I was fiddling with the -j flag once and ran into a bunch of > problems, when it was pointed out that this isn't a "supported" > way of doing a make buildworld. I stopped using it and all was > well. Very interesting. On page 490 of "FreeBSD Unleashed" it references the -j4 parameter as a way to speed up the make buildworld process by spawning multiple simultaneous processes. The same thing is referenced in Chapter 20 of the FreeBSD Handbook. Is this now depreciated?