Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:33:21 -0700
From:      Rui Paulo <rpaulo@FreeBSD.org>
To:        mexas@bristol.ac.uk
Cc:        glebius@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org, net@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ipfilter(4) needs maintainer
Message-ID:  <9ED46F7A-8A5A-4668-8B00-D58278C9A0DA@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <201304141911.r3EJBMOb084882@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>
References:  <201304141911.r3EJBMOb084882@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2013/04/14, at 12:11, Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bris.ac.uk> wrote:

> 	A migration *guide*, yes. Tools to convert one syntax to =
another: no.
>=20
> ok, so what is the brief migraiton advice?

It's still being written.

> The Handbook mentions PF and IPFW.
> I gather from your mails that PF is the recommended choice.
> Is that so?

Yes, because of how much easier it is to convert from ipf to pf version =
ipf to ipfw.

> If I choose PF, can I just follow the
> Handbook PF section, and once it's working,
> remove all IPF related kernel options and config
> files?


Yes, that will be the plan.

Regards,
--
Rui Paulo




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9ED46F7A-8A5A-4668-8B00-D58278C9A0DA>