Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 19:23:23 +0100 From: Stefan Farfeleder <stefan@fafoe.narf.at> To: "boyd, rounin" <boyd@insultant.net> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] libc_r bug: successful close(2) sets errno to ENOTTY Message-ID: <20031124182322.GB621@wombat.fafoe.narf.at> In-Reply-To: <03a601c3b2b5$7bc15b80$b9844051@insultant.net> References: <20031123141408.GA1426@ratsnest.hole> <20031124174457.GB27782@madman.celabo.org> <03a601c3b2b5$7bc15b80$b9844051@insultant.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 07:05:02PM +0100, boyd, rounin wrote: > From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> > > The application is broken. You must only check errno if you get an > > error indication from the library call. > > errno is only meaningful after a syscall error. Wrong, counter-example: strtol(). Stefan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031124182322.GB621>