Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 17:08:02 -0400 From: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> To: "Sam Fourman Jr." <sfourman@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: state of flash on FreeBSD 7? Message-ID: <18397.35890.805252.858028@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <11167f520803161133t24004fbatc530b81f8d96a21f@mail.gmail.com> References: <77647f500803151709y2dbe8f65jb02fb8d73b2f407d@mail.gmail.com> <200803161455.20738.ltcddata@davids-website.com> <20080316161534.GB25231@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20080316133703.6597b682@scorpio> <11167f520803161133t24004fbatc530b81f8d96a21f@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sam Fourman Jr. writes: > I Think the real trouble here is that Adobe, does not want to > make us a native FreeBSD version. The last time I looked into this: Adobe does not (seem to) have a problem with FreeBSD; indeed, I got the impression they barely know we exist. What they seem resistant to is publishing a complete and accurate specification that would allow third parties to write interface code. This is said to be changing with Flash 10. /If/ I remember correctly, the guts will still be proprietary but it will connect to a wrapper whose interface will publicly available. (Search keyword = "ActionScript" ???) Robert Huff
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?18397.35890.805252.858028>