Date: Fri, 6 Sep 1996 11:30:25 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp> To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> Cc: Paul Richards <p.richards@elsevier.co.uk>, rkw@dataplex.net, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Latest Current build failure Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.93.960906102955.24754D-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <199609052057.NAA09868@phaeton.artisoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 5 Sep 1996, Terry Lambert wrote: > The old saw: how do you sanely implement revoloution? The US has a > complete governmental overthrow every 4-8 years, and does so without > blood running in the streets. All we are discussing here is a change > in the rules of order -- we don't even want an overthrow. Does revolution mean the government must sign a contract accepting responsibility for all potential damage for an unspecified period of time?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SV4.3.93.960906102955.24754D-100000>