Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 28 Jan 1997 19:43:13 -0600 (CST)
From:      "Jay D. Nelson" <jdn@qiv.com>
To:        Joe McGuckin <joe@via.net>
Cc:        questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: PPPD vs. iijppp ??
Message-ID:  <Pine.NEB.3.95.970128193750.285A-100000@acp.qiv.com>
In-Reply-To: <199701282354.PAA25281@monk.via.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I don't know which is better -- but -- pppd (kernel ppp) has worked all
the time, everytime. I wish I could use ijppp for the convenience. (It
works with Cisco's but not with others.) I suspect the tunnel driver,
e.g., hosts that understand it work -- those that don't can't, but I
don't know. Since pppd works, I haven't fussed with it.

-- Jay

On Tue, 28 Jan 1997, Joe McGuckin wrote:

->
->
->I need to use my FreeBSD box for incoming PPP.
->
->Which package is better? (e.g. more reliable, easier to configure
->for incoming PPP.)
->
->Does either package support assigning dynamic addresses from a pool?
->
->Thanks,
->
->Joe
->




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.95.970128193750.285A-100000>