Date: Sat, 26 Apr 1997 13:46:18 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: gibbs@plutotech.com (Justin T. Gibbs) Cc: terry@lambert.org, michaelh@cet.co.jp, joa@kuebart.stuttgart.netsurf.de, sysop@mixcom.com, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VFAT 32 support in msdosfs Message-ID: <199704262046.NAA07616@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199704262041.OAA00572@pluto.plutotech.com> from "Justin T. Gibbs" at Apr 26, 97 03:39:29 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >> By the time you add Unicode and security to Win95 you would have WinNT. > > > >Windows 95 already has Unicode. > > Not outside the filesystem. 99.9% of all UNICODE APIs in Win95 simply > return. Not the ActiveX string marshalling interfaces I've been using. Are you referring to the ones implemented by CTL3D32.DLL? We've already been over all that... they don't count, because smart programmers will use the subset common to both platforms. Even dumb programmers will, if they want to get their "Designed For Windows 95" logo certification, which requires that the progam also run on NT. Regards, Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704262046.NAA07616>