Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 19:54:50 +1000 (EST) From: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au> To: dima@best.net Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: btw Message-ID: <199706191002.DAA19856@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <199706190826.BAA19159@burka.rdy.com> from "Dima Ruban" at Jun 19, 97 01:26:06 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In some mail from Dima Ruban, sie said: > > Hey guys! > > Why do we call /etc/rc.local by: (thats from /etc/rc) > # Do traditional (but rather obsolete) rc.local file if it exists. > [ -f /etc/rc.local ] && sh /etc/rc.local > ^^^^ > and not ". /etc/rc.local"? does rc (sh) handle errors the same way with "sh xx" and ". xx" ?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199706191002.DAA19856>