Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 25 Jun 1998 14:07:02 -0600
From:      "M. Warner Losh" <imp@pencil-box.village.org>
To:        stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: CAM v aic 
Message-ID:  <199806252007.OAA00469@pencil-box.village.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 05 Jun 1998 10:04:27 MDT." <199806051604.KAA01965@narnia.plutotech.com> 
References:  <199806051604.KAA01965@narnia.plutotech.com>  

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199806051604.KAA01965@narnia.plutotech.com> "Justin T. Gibbs" writes:
: The aic-6260/6360 will be supported before CAM is integrated into any
: branch.  Lack of Device/controller support is the reason CAM hasn't
: been integrated to date.

Asking a tangentially related question to -stable:  Does anybody know
how to run perforce through a socks firewall?  perforce only seems to
distribute a static binary, which means a person behind a firewall
can't just RUNSOCS it.

Suggestions?

Warner

P.S.  It is times like this that one had the ability to push a system
call dispatch module on a per process basis...

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199806252007.OAA00469>