Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1998 13:31:22 -0700 (PDT) From: rick hamell <hamellr@dsinw.com> Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PC mag ref (good and bad) to FreeBSD Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.981013132915.19635E-100000@dsinw.com> In-Reply-To: <19981013114006.B287@futuresouth.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I think they worded that in an ambiguous way: "WinNT surpassed FreeBSD." > That's what they wanted you to read, but I think what they actually meant > was, "WinNT's increase in performance with added memory surpassed > FreeBSD's increase in performance with added memory." That of course just > means that WinNT needed more RAM, while FreeBSD was perfectly happy with > what it had. Of course everything one reads in one of those magazines needs to be taken with a grain of salt (in some cases an entire salt lick!) It'd be interesting to see exactly how much money Microsoft spends in adveritising to that magazine. Case in point... I saw one magazine a few years back say that Packard Bell was the BEST overall computer to buy! Rick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.981013132915.19635E-100000>