Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 15:12:23 -0600 (MDT) From: Brian Handy <handy@lambic.physics.montana.edu> To: razzle dazzle root beer <marko@Oof.NET> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: accellerated X 5.0 multihead on 3.2-stable with matrox mil G200 Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9906091510340.7551-100000@lambic.physics.montana.edu> In-Reply-To: <19990609165612.H6847@oof.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Also, even in single monitor more, accelX is extremely slow compared to Xfree, >so much that it is practically useless. I suppose I could install freebsd2.2 >but I'd give up the second Xeon processor then. :( Wow, is this true? In the past on my machine (MM II w/ 8MB) I found the Xig server to be a hair faster than XFree86. That was only using one machine, and using Xaccel 4.x. Seems strange it would slow down so significantly. I haven't tried doing it under >=3.2 yet, and I may not. I'm holding out for XFree 4.0 with overlay visuals before I plunk down more money for the server. Brian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9906091510340.7551-100000>