Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 11:16:00 -0700 From: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@osd.bsdi.com> To: jlemon@flugsvamp.com Cc: darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au, jlemon@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, core@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet fil.c ip_auth.c ip_auth.h ip_compat.h ip_fil.c ip_fil.h ip_frag.c ip_frag.h ip_ftp_pxy.c Message-ID: <20010607111600X.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> In-Reply-To: <20010607130440.Z82158@prism.flugsvamp.com> References: <200106071433.AAA07396@avalon.reed.wattle.id.au> <20010607105241J.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> <20010607130440.Z82158@prism.flugsvamp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@flugsvamp.com> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet fil.c ip_auth.c ip_auth.h ip_compat.h ip_fil.c ip_fil.h ip_frag.c ip_frag.h ip_ftp_pxy.c Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 13:04:40 -0500 > Hmm. I recall that one of the participants in the discussion > happened to be a certain "jkh", and at no time was it brought > up to me that "hey, there is a procedure XXX to follow". Then perhaps the committer's guide should be amended to reflect it. I always thought of this as one of those "common sense" guidelines that was so well-understood as to be redundant in printed form. I was watching the conversation, yes, but my assumption also was that when this was actually eventually done, it would be done by all the usual procedures. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010607111600X.jkh>