Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 23:34:19 +0100 From: Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be> To: Greg Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org>, scanner@jurai.net Cc: Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be>, Hiten Pandya <hitmaster2k@yahoo.com>, Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IBM suing (was: RMS Suing was [SUGGESTION] - JFS for FreeBSD) Message-ID: <a05101020b842d1829392@[10.0.1.22]> In-Reply-To: <20011215122158.A87600@monorchid.lemis.com> References: <20011215112539.L85108@monorchid.lemis.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0112142003280.90198-100000@sasami.jurai.net> <20011215122158.A87600@monorchid.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 12:21 PM +1030 on 2001/12/15, Greg Lehey wrote: >> Yes doing so would be nice. For that exact reason. To see some real >> numbers and how they stack up. However i'm with brad it would be better >> considering the nature of the GPL on JFS, to get co-operation from >> SGI. Maybe they would consider another point of view in licensing their >> XFS to the BSD folks. Then again maybe not. > > I'd bet on them not doing it. They're a lot more likely to do it than IBM. > Feel free to go ahead. But I really don't think that you'll have much > success. Don't get me wrong, I think that XFS has a lot of advantages > too. You're more likely to get SGI to respond positively than IBM. -- Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be> H4sICIFgXzsCA2RtYS1zaWcAPVHLbsMwDDvXX0H0kkvbfxiwVw8FCmzAzqqj1F4dy7CdBfn7 Kc6wmyGRFEnvvxiWQoCvqI7RSWTcfGXQNqCUAnfIU+AT8OZ/GCNjRVlH0bKpguJkxiITZqes MxwpSucyDJzXxQEUe/ihgXqJXUXwD9ajB6NHonLmNrUSK9nacHQnH097szO74xFXqtlbT3il wMsBz5cnfCR5cEmci0Rj9u/jqBbPeES1I4PeFBXPUIT1XDSOuutFXylzrQvGyboWstCoQZyP dxX4dLx0eauFe1x9puhoi0Ao1omEJo+BZ6XLVNaVpWiKekxN0VK2VMpmAy+Bk7ZV4SO+p1L/ uErNRS/qH2iFU+iNOtbcmVt9N16lfF7tLv9FXNj8AiyNcOi1AQAA To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a05101020b842d1829392>