Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 01:09:42 -0600 From: Mike Makonnen <makonnen@pacbell.net> To: Mike Silbersack <silby@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src UPDATING Message-ID: <1020323382.3871.37.camel@kokeb.ambesa.net> In-Reply-To: <200205020238.g422cIm56240@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200205020238.g422cIm56240@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 20:38, Mike Silbersack wrote: > silby 2002/05/01 19:38:18 PDT > > Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_4) > . UPDATING > Log: > Remove entry about ephemeral port range change MFC, as it > has been un-MFC'd. > > Revision Changes Path > 1.73.2.65 +0 -17 src/UPDATING Applogies if this has already been beaten to death. It seems to me that when changes like this one (where a previously made change is un-done) are required in UPDATING, it would be better to add another entry stating that the change has been un-done, instead of removing it completely from UPDATING. Simply removing the relevant entry can potentially be confusing to users who _do_ read UPDATING. My reasoning is as follows: if the original change was important enough to warrant a mention, then its reversal must also be just as important. Cheers, Mike Makonnen. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1020323382.3871.37.camel>