Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 11:12:45 +0200 From: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> To: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk> Cc: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The future of perl on FreeBSD Message-ID: <20020508111245.D57163@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> In-Reply-To: <20020508090615.GB9477@genius.tao.org.uk>; from joe@tao.org.uk on Wed, May 08, 2002 at 10:06:15AM %2B0100 References: <xzpd6w7ilv6.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020508075112.66AB638FD@overcee.wemm.org> <20020508090615.GB9477@genius.tao.org.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--yLVHuoLXiP9kZBkt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 10:06:15AM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote: > On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 12:51:12AM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: > > pkg_update should probably be cvs rm'ed and replaced by the portupgrade > > package from the ports collection. >=20 > We can't replace it with portupgrade in the base system, because > portupgrade is implemented in ruby, which isn't in the base system. So, now that perl is going to go, when is ruby going to be imported? :) </JOKE> --Stijn --=20 Tact, n.: The unsaid part of what you're thinking. --yLVHuoLXiP9kZBkt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE82OwNY3r/tLQmfWcRAk0PAJ9U3+AXxrAIF8tDoe0vg787wLXlyQCfa+wD 3VMKedSzSkihsQoX8MUOSqc= =xMOU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yLVHuoLXiP9kZBkt-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020508111245.D57163>