Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 21:46:02 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern vfs_bio.c src/sys/sys bio.h Message-ID: <2054.1032119162@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 15 Sep 2002 12:39:32 PDT." <200209151939.g8FJdWfo057422@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200209151939.g8FJdWfo057422@apollo.backplane.com>, Matthew Dillon w rites: > At least if you use a mutex you have something that is deterministic > and you are using common interlock code whos efficiencies can be attacked > in just one place later on. By not using a mutex you are just creating > a mess of work that someone will have to fix later on. It's that simple. I normally claim that code speaks louder than words, you make me doubt it. But code still speaks more informed, no doubt about that. Read the code, until then, shut up. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2054.1032119162>