Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 02:13:27 +0300 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Subject: Re: OPIE breakage: backout & patch for review Message-ID: <20030216231326.GA6604@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20030216225120.GA6374@nagual.pp.ru> References: <20030216185426.GB52253@dragon.nuxi.com> <200302161911.h1GJBnaX034785@grimreaper.grondar.org> <20030216204847.GA5233@nagual.pp.ru> <20030216153951.A98564@FreeBSD.org> <20030216225120.GA6374@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 01:51:20 +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > properly). If you tune opiezed+pamified apps to work as you need, pure > opized stops working and vice versa. In this phrase I mean documented OPIE tuning of OPIE config files (old way), without any new additions and requirements, basically I mean old setups working for years. F.e. if you delete /etc/opieaccess (which is legal from OPIE point of view), you will be not able to log in locally via opiezed+pamified apps, but able with opiezed. (Remember, we talk about initial variant from des, now he fix situation and people who want to shoot their foot needs to remove default PAM configuration option "allow_local") -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030216231326.GA6604>