Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 18:11:20 +0300 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@cell.sick.ru> To: veedee@c7.campus.utcluj.ro Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: different traffic accounting trafd vs. ipcad Message-ID: <20040224151120.GA79679@cell.sick.ru> In-Reply-To: <20040224145924.GA96892@c7.campus.utcluj.ro> References: <20040224152136.S97179@juergen.edv-winter.de> <20040224144743.GA79478@cell.sick.ru> <20040224145924.GA96892@c7.campus.utcluj.ro>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 04:59:24PM +0200, veedee@c7.campus.utcluj.ro wrote: v> > trafd itself is very buggy. I'd better do not trust v> > its data. Use ipcad, ipacct or ng_ipacct. trafd'd bugginess was discussed a v> > lot in different russian-speaking mailinglists. v> v> Can you please be more specific? What do you mean by buggy? I haven't v> seen anything about that on the WWW, but then again, I do not speak russian v> :( Look at ports/net/trafd/files/patch-ah. This will make your opinion about code quality :) -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040224151120.GA79679>