Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 15:15:53 -0800 From: Peter Losher <Peter_Losher@isc.org> To: Jesper Skriver <jesper@skriver.dk> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: ftp.freebsd.org lost in combat? Message-ID: <200403061515.53300.Peter_Losher@isc.org> In-Reply-To: <20040306230131.GD46018@skriver.dk> References: <1077996933.1660.54.camel@hood.oook.cz> <200403061500.26522.Peter_Losher@isc.org> <20040306230131.GD46018@skriver.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 06 March 2004 03:01 pm, Jesper Skriver wrote: > Yes - but I were to guess, most users connect via IPv4 still :) I know, I just wanted to point it out that we wern't completely=20 absent. :) > Do you know why your IPv4 address has been removed ? It was at my request - I am currently having Issues w/ 5.2 -REL on ths=20 system (mainly spin lock panics). The kernel has been in the WITNESS=20 protection program the last several weeks where the problem has yet to=20 reappear, but it absolutely does no good for performance. :( =20 So I asked to be scaled back to just IPv6 duty so the system doesn't slow=20 to the level of cold molasses during the day until the spin lock issues=20 are resolved. This is so I can run w/ a WITNESS-free kernel again, w/o=20 getting woken up in the middle of the night/morning by our monitoring=20 gear because the system panic'ed. :( =46or those interested in the details, I have posted several times on the=20 issue in current@. =20 Best Wishes - Peter =2D --=20 Peter_Losher@isc.org | ISC | OpenPGP Key E8048D08 | "The bits must flow" =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFASlupPtVx9OgEjQgRAgHJAJwIFyl9Hf5xq7t3CVM9AhBqSeOK4gCeJaJO fz1OYeaHOfWFtBKnt5W+oDM=3D =3DXe8/ =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200403061515.53300.Peter_Losher>