Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 03:22:19 +0200 From: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> To: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org> Cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 Message-ID: <20040709032219.A38246@newtrinity.zeist.de> In-Reply-To: <20040708182309.E97786@pooker.samsco.org>; from scottl@freebsd.org on Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 06:25:32PM -0600 References: <20040708235757.B02D67303F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20040708182309.E97786@pooker.samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 06:25:32PM -0600, Scott Long wrote: > David, > > Is this due to binutils? If so, is there anything that any of us can do > to help? > It's a GCC bug. A patch fixing it is awaiting commit/approval by kan@. The tinderbox should have been running with the patch locally applied in this run but looks like something went wrong: > TB --- 2004-07-08 23:16:13 - WARNING: specified patch file does not exist
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040709032219.A38246>