Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 09:04:05 -0600 From: Greg Lewis <glewis@eyesbeyond.com> To: Kirill Ponomarew <krion@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/72331: Update port: x11-wm/afterstep-stable to 2.00.00 Message-ID: <20041005150405.GA76982@misty.eyesbeyond.com> In-Reply-To: <200410041836.i94IaPog091196@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200410041836.i94IaPog091196@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 06:36:25PM +0000, Kirill Ponomarew wrote: > Synopsis: Update port: x11-wm/afterstep-stable to 2.00.00 > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->krion > Responsible-Changed-By: krion > Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Oct 4 18:36:23 GMT 2004 > Responsible-Changed-Why: > Grab. Shouldn't this be assigned to demon@ as the maintainer? Also, this PR is related to PR 69837 which was a port to an earlier 2.00 beta (except it was submitted as a new port rather than an update). I wonder if we should just update the afterstep port itself instead of having that point at an ancient version while afterstep-stable points at the one you almost certainly want (does anyone still use AfterStep 1.0?). At the very least we should consider moving afterstep to afterstep1 and replace it with this update and retire afterstep-stable. IMO of course. -- Greg Lewis Email : glewis@eyesbeyond.com Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com Information Technology FreeBSD : glewis@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041005150405.GA76982>