Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 03:05:30 -0800 From: Peter Kieser <pfak@telus.net> To: Dick Hoogendijk <dick@nagual.st> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD multi-homed w/ipnat Message-ID: <4215CBFA.7090706@telus.net> In-Reply-To: <20050218105830.GC34932@lothlorien.nagual.st> References: <4215BD9A.7070002@telus.net> <20050218105830.GC34932@lothlorien.nagual.st>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dick Hoogendijk wrote: >On 18 Feb Peter Kieser wrote: > > >>vr0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 >> inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 >> inet6 fe80::211:d8ff:fe3d:564a%vr0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 >> ether 00:11:d8:3d:56:4a >> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>) >> status: active >>map dc0 192.168.1.0/24 -> 0/32 >>map dc1 192.168.2.0/24 -> 0/32 >> >> > >I only seee 192.168.1.1 defined. Is this a typo or is there inof >missing? > > > The map with the CIDR prefix only specifies what IP addresses the NAT will masquerade for, still doesn't explain why 192.168.1.0/24 masquarde fails to work. You can specify the subnet mask for 192.168.1.1 as 255.255.254.0 to cover both those blocks, which is a 192.168.0.0/23.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4215CBFA.7090706>