Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:39:20 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Peter Jeremy <PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: Excessive delays due to syncer kthread Message-ID: <20050227103919.GA18033@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050227102404.GB96334@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> References: <20050226071308.GN57256@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1050226111418.62606C-100000@fledge.watson.org> <20050227032315.GA96334@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> <20050227032829.GA75730@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050227102404.GB96334@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 09:24:04PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On Sat, 2005-Feb-26 19:28:29 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >I don't think there are known problems with use of PREEMPTION on > >RELENG_5. >=20 > Thanks for that. How about RELENG_5_3? Do I need to move to > -STABLE (and traditionally, this point of the release cycle is not > a good time to be running -STABLE). I think RELENG_5_3 is good too. I think there were some problems with PREEMPTION during the 5.3 release cycle, but they were all fixed before release. Kris --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCIaNXWry0BWjoQKURAiErAJkBxiTjnIIqxqYsUmbBQqWa4gKRTACfaLYP joLAswAhK0uoWNKQs91lEvE= =bmZ5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050227103919.GA18033>