Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 07:18:25 +0900 From: "Sangwoo Shim" <sangwoos@gmail.com> To: "Herve Boulouis" <amon@sockar.homeip.net> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: NUMA and Dual-Core Support Message-ID: <4cbd01f40603131418k56b63741t@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20060313115205.GA17399@ra.aabs> References: <60F1B0FC76F1504A91839905DA7EBDB603903C@ssuzexmb3.amd.com> <2fd864e0603130256l52f5b0aoa5e2a4c720aa3e10@mail.gmail.com> <2fd864e0603130300m12a02932tb82c3c5fa4ac1973@mail.gmail.com> <200603130823.35433.joao@matik.com.br> <20060313115205.GA17399@ra.aabs>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2006/3/13, Herve Boulouis <amon@sockar.homeip.net>: > Le 13/03/2006 08:23, JoaoBR a =E9crit: > > > > Is the memory access with dual-core (not HT) the the same as with > > dual-processores? Would NUMA have any impact on dual-cores? > > Since the memory controller is shared between the 2 cores on dual core > opterons, I doubt you'll see any benefits on memory accesses with a NUMA > aware scheduler. > There are multi-processor opteron systems (e.g., 2 of dual-core processors)= :-) > -- > Herve Boulouis > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Regards, Sangwoo Shim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4cbd01f40603131418k56b63741t>