Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:28:07 -0400 From: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org> To: Brian A. Seklecki <lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Syslog-ng users' and developers' mailing list <syslog-ng@lists.balabit.hu>, marsgmiro@gmail.com, sem@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [syslog-ng] building 2.0 on freebsd Message-ID: <E1E20384-F31B-4F91-B47F-3EBD59D19EBD@khera.org> In-Reply-To: <20061024190341.J63561@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org> References: <A2155439-EE64-4B29-8FA3-75616468CC10@khera.org> <85198155-D6C6-426E-BC50-A91F05C38040@khera.org> <20061024190341.J63561@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Apple-Mail-4-950377424 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On Oct 24, 2006, at 7:09 PM, Brian A. Seklecki wrote: > You should try to work closely with the FreeBSD port maintainer for > sysutils/syslog-ng to integrate 2.x into a Port. Unless there is a > liscencing restriction I don't know preventing a enw sysutils/ > syslog-ng2/ port, we're still at 1.6.11 in Ports. I am still evaluating whether I will be using this software in our infrastructure. If I do (which seems likely), I plan to adopt the port once 2.0 is released. I don't see a compelling reason to keep a separate 2.0 version of the port as it is back-compatible, and I believe that the base port name, syslog-ng, should be the latest version always. That's how I maintain the postfix port, too :-) --Apple-Mail-4-950377424--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1E20384-F31B-4F91-B47F-3EBD59D19EBD>