Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:51:16 -0400 From: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org> To: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: large RAID volume partition strategy Message-ID: <786DB564-BBB1-4D7D-ACDF-523F0E7EB291@khera.org> In-Reply-To: <20070829184306.GC42906@voodoo.bawue.com> References: <31BB09D7-B58A-47AC-8DD1-6BB8141170D8@khera.org> <fa5b4v$8e5$1@sea.gmane.org> <EED39309-A95F-4A2D-8E35-C1650A55E482@khera.org> <fa5men$v5r$1@sea.gmane.org> <94ECF72B-B0E9-492C-8279-29989FAAE19C@khera.org> <20070829184306.GC42906@voodoo.bawue.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Aug 29, 2007, at 2:43 PM, Kirill Ponomarew wrote: > What type I/O did you test, random read/writes, sequential writes ? > The performance of RAID group always depends on what software you > run on your RAID group. If it's database, be prepared for many > random read/writes, hence dd(1) tests would be useless. I ran my database on it with a sample workload based on our live workload. Anything else would be a waste of time.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?786DB564-BBB1-4D7D-ACDF-523F0E7EB291>