Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:15:18 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Nikola =?UTF-8?B?TGXEjWnEhw==?= <nikola.lecic@anthesphoria.net> Cc: "Heiko Wundram \(Beenic\)" <wundram@beenic.net>, Erich Dollansky <oceanare@pacific.net.sg>, FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what happened to linuxflashplugin? Message-ID: <20080211211052.X5691@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20080211210835.23c11096@anthesphoria.net> References: <47AFC80B.8090303@gmail.com> <47B05924.5000405@cs.okstate.edu> <47B05C7A.80602@pacific.net.sg> <200802111540.34420.wundram@beenic.net> <20080211161507.6e82fbd4@anthesphoria.net> <47B06A39.7090708@pacific.net.sg> <20080211210835.23c11096@anthesphoria.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> >> YouTube? Isn't the right spelling YouPorn? > > No, it isn't. If you find nothing worth watching on *You*Tube, it > doesn't mean that others can't find interesting things. For example, I > find there a lot of good and difficult-to-find material from some fields > of art. get this interestinf stuff down to your disk with youtube-dl, then watch with mplayer. at least you will have it on your disk, not download each time as youtube does everything to prevent caching the stuff. as it's exactly agains efficiency, they have a reason to do this. any explanations why? i think because then they are able to keep "control" on the stuff, being able to remove anything at will, with no copy on users computers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080211211052.X5691>