Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:42:22 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Aleksey Perov <algardo@sura.ru> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, kib@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x Message-ID: <47B5F92E.5070103@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20080215144923.b66240ba.algardo@sura.ru> References: <20080214114759.R75215@mail.rsts.org> <47B49A16.1080103@FreeBSD.org> <20080214131026.Y75492@mail.rsts.org> <47B4D139.5020701@FreeBSD.org> <47B4D27C.9010503@FreeBSD.org> <47B569C0.30006@FreeBSD.org> <20080215144923.b66240ba.algardo@sura.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Aleksey Perov wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > >> I checked with the developer, and no-one running 6.x and quotas ever >> replied to multiple requests to test the patch. It can be found here if >> you want to resolve this performance problem without upgrading to 7.0: >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/quotagiant/quotas-RELENG_6-20070623-1455.patch > > Well, I'm running RELENG_6 SMP system with this patch since september > 2007 (last updated 2008-02-08), and I haven't seen any quota-related > problem. Quota-enabled partition is 60 GB UFS2 containing 25,000+ > customers' home directories with Maildir-style mailboxes and surviving > 100,000+ deliveries (file creations) and approximately the same number > of retrievals (file deletions) each day. > > mail:~# df -i /disk1 > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity iused ifree %iused Mounted on > /dev/da1s1d 66343254 25904146 35131648 42% 1479119 7117359 17% /disk1 > mail:~# mount > /dev/da1s1d on /disk1 (ufs, local, noexec, nosuid, with quotas, soft-updates) > > If I can run some specific (stress?) tests that might provide useful > information, let me know. Output of dmesg, vmstat, iostat, top, etc -- > just ask. Thanks, that is precisely the kind of feedback we are looking for. Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47B5F92E.5070103>