Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:29:36 -0400 From: "Mikhail T." <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com> To: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> Cc: "freebsd-bluetooth@freebsd.org" <freebsd-bluetooth@freebsd.org> Subject: group-related limits (Re: RFC: obexapp - virtual root folder for each device) Message-ID: <49E51C60.5020302@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <20090414184507.5afc4a88@bhuda.mired.org> References: <bb4a86c70904131640n7cf471c0o7a56a43d722a90e1@mail.gmail.com> <49E3DB35.4030601@aldan.algebra.com> <bb4a86c70904131909k44aba88dk126d25a4f1fc3744@mail.gmail.com> <49E41DBB.5090805@aldan.algebra.com> <bb4a86c70904140934h5b967efby4e3238bd97c5ca01@mail.gmail.com> <20090414184507.5afc4a88@bhuda.mired.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Meyer написав(ла):
> On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 09:34:43 -0700
> Maksim Yevmenkin <maksim.yevmenkin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> Maksim Yevmenkin написав(ла):
>>> because all of the bluetooth users would have to be listed in obex'
>>> group and so there can be no more than 20 of them (I think, that's the
>>> limit on a group size).
>>>
>
> Just so this doesn't wind up being quoted as accurate:
>
> There are no limits on how many people can be in a group. There is a
> limit on how many groups a person can be in (or was; I haven't
> verified that this hasn't been changed recently).
Thanks for the correction, Mike. I had only a vague memory of there
being some limits related to groups -- from years ago :-)
But still, if a person can only participate in so many groups, forcing
participation in yet another one for common, non-administrative
functionality should be avoided...
Fortunately, we seem to have just agreed on a more straightforward way
anyway. Yours,
-mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49E51C60.5020302>