Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:54:54 -0700
From:      Rudy <crapsh@monkeybrains.net>
To:        Greg Byshenk <freebsd@byshenk.net>
Cc:        Daniel Bond <db@danielbond.org>, FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: em0 watchdog timeouts
Message-ID:  <4ACA5D1E.10006@monkeybrains.net>
In-Reply-To: <20091005200900.GE15606@core.byshenk.net>
References:  <2a41acea0909301556g1df7dbafv813f5924553c8bfb@mail.gmail.com>	<4AC5198E.7030609@monkeybrains.net>	<4AC51B4C.7080905@monkeybrains.net>	<2a41acea0910011450v41590f3dn112f367f26faed2d@mail.gmail.com>	<4AC64835.3060107@monkeybrains.net>	<2a41acea0910021237w415efa2cs4354a0f99aef8f6@mail.gmail.com>	<4AC66437.4040704@monkeybrains.net>	<6194E9BC-3A3D-4941-A777-88C7411905B0@danielbond.org>	<2a41acea0910050957x2d085e90w2ebea7f9eb87c3e4@mail.gmail.com>	<57F8F331-E823-4F88-BDD5-A8B95A3B4CB6@danielbond.org> <20091005200900.GE15606@core.byshenk.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Finally, while doing some comparisons, I realized that the motherboard
> having the problem was _not_ the same as the others; it was similar, but
> not identical.

This is a good piece of info.  I can try swapping out the MB and see 
what happens.

I do want to add: thank you Jack for all your help and if does turn out 
to be the MB, then double thanks.  Viva Monday!   :)

What would be nice would be MORE info for a watchdog timeout... maybe a 
sysctl dev.watchdog.debug=1 or something where when a watchdog event 
happened --- for whatever driver --- a bunch of stats were dumped 
relating to the event.

Rudy



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4ACA5D1E.10006>