Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 21:05:41 +0430 From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <stephane@laperouse.internatif.org> To: Scott W <wegster@mindcore.net> Cc: FreeBSD questions List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Why userland , basesystem and Kernel are together?! Message-ID: <20031210163541.GA800@fetiche.sources.org> In-Reply-To: <3FD633A9.20801@mindcore.net> References: <012701c3bde4$4acf2b30$019c9752@xp> <20031209013027.GC1099@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <03da01c3be90$032636f0$019c9752@xp> <3FD633A9.20801@mindcore.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 03:42:17PM -0500, Scott W <wegster@mindcore.net> wrote a message of 104 lines which said: > 1. Kernel. Umm, I hope I don't have to expain this one ;-) > 2. Core system- This one can likely be argued a bit with bsd (and > 3. userland apps- Kernel and core make a rudimentary system, but I don't have the Handbook to check and I'm offline at the present time but I'm suprised. I thought that "userland" meaned "everything which is not the kernel", including the base system. What you call "userland", "everything but the base system", seems to be what the Handbook calls the ports.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031210163541.GA800>