Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:16:57 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2 x quad-core system is slower that 2 x dual core on FreeBSD Message-ID: <fi6jsb$hqu$1@ger.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <4746B42E.4040709@bulinfo.net> References: <4741905E.8050300@chistydom.ru> <fhs3s5$knj$1@ger.gmane.org> <47419AB3.5030008@chistydom.ru> <fhs7db$2es$1@ger.gmane.org> <4741B3DE.2000009@chistydom.ru> <fhsl0v$n85$1@ger.gmane.org> <47430AE8.7050408@chistydom.ru> <9bbcef730711200915n12e37efcs67cf260641b9baab@mail.gmail.com> <47469EF9.70409@bulinfo.net> <9bbcef730711230216l74c30a08ja04a558742789b17@mail.gmail.com> <4746B42E.4040709@bulinfo.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig876A1DE41C3943F1B27F9DA5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Krassimir Slavchev wrote: > That's true but if the tests are same then they can be compared. >=20 >> - the code is most likely checking for changes in PHP libraries) >=20 > This is not recommended for production systems. PHP code accelerators / caches do that all the time. require_once() also does it. > Yes, may be it is easier to write perl/php scripts. I'm glad you're volunteering :) --------------enig876A1DE41C3943F1B27F9DA5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHRtLJldnAQVacBcgRApYfAJ9NyMEaUFS0pv9EHHagu3kJSG9NmQCeJwvM c17nCFhZXs8Oe6NM8F7YpIM= =d30v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig876A1DE41C3943F1B27F9DA5--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fi6jsb$hqu$1>