Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 8 Feb 2010 12:05:31 +0200
From:      Eitan Adler <eitanadlerlist@gmail.com>
To:        Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: better way to handle required rebuild on library bump
Message-ID:  <a0777e081002080205r10d097c9hfc539af57fc0c884@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B6F3C19.708@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <d873d5be1002071344k5b5c8e22w725eb0f426671bfa@mail.gmail.com>  <4B6F3C19.708@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
With due respect to the creativity of the OP, the whole conversation is
basically moot since in almost all cases a library major version change
requires a change to the LIB_DEPENDS line in the port anyway, so a
PORTREVISION bump is a very tiny bit of additional work.

Ah, I did not realize this. As you said my point is moot anyway.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a0777e081002080205r10d097c9hfc539af57fc0c884>