Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:25:41 +0000 From: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org> To: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recent ports removal Message-ID: <CADLo83-nOD=kP%2BUa5Z3ZcfW8LsHx=H0ZsAXCZrQjC5fsmOe3_Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4EC2BB2E.7060404@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <20111109124325.17efc0d1.stas@deglitch.com> <20111109222435.GD92221@azathoth.lan> <20111110110637.GA3514@hades.panopticon> <4EBCC587.10701@FreeBSD.org> <20111111100708.GA24126@hades.panopticon> <20111111124012.3ec48cb3.stas@deglitch.com> <20111111213817.GB8896@lonesome.com> <4EBD9E6F.3040708@delphij.net> <4EBDA077.5070105@FreeBSD.org> <4EC2B720.4000605@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4EC2BB2E.7060404@infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 15 November 2011 19:19, Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> wrote: > On 15/11/2011 19:01, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> On 11/11/2011 22:23, Doug Barton wrote: >>>> By its >>>>> nature, deprecated ports tends not to be updated for long time, port >>>>> tools like portmaster, portupgrade will not even see it because no >>>>> PORTREVISION bump happen. >> >>> portmaster -L will warn you about ports marked >>> DEPRECATED/FORBIDDEN/IGNORE/BROKEN if you run it against an updated >>> ports tree. One area where we actually can improve here is to also put >>> this information in the INDEX. I have an idea for that, just haven't >>> been able to put the time into making it happen. >> >> How about something like the attached? > > Ooops. =A0Wrong diff. =A0Like this: Why have you included IGNOREd? Just curious.... Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo83-nOD=kP%2BUa5Z3ZcfW8LsHx=H0ZsAXCZrQjC5fsmOe3_Q>