Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 10:52:59 +0000 From: Karl Pielorz <kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk> To: =?UTF-8?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=C3=A9?= <roger.pau@citrix.com>, freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xen Guests / NTP best practice? Message-ID: <F3CD87E5453C039FABA1901C@study64.tdx.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <5298D244.3070905@citrix.com> References: <960417385DD53D94B3E2DF1C@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <5298D244.3070905@citrix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--On 29 November 2013 18:43:32 +0100 Roger Pau Monn=C3=A9=20 <roger.pau@citrix.com> wrote: > There have been some improvements in 10 regarding timekeeping, now > FreeBSD makes use of the PV timer and PV clock when running under HVM, > which should be more stable. > > Could you try if your issues with ntp are reproducible on 10? Sure, I'll give 10 a go. Does the above mean for a VM you don't need to run = ntp? (i.e. it'll stay in sync with dom0 / the XenServer?) - or is ntp still = necessary? Likewise do you know if there is any recommended solution for 9.x (which is = the bulk of our VM's). Thanks, -Karl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F3CD87E5453C039FABA1901C>