Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 16:39:04 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Fabian Wenk <fabian@wenks.ch> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UNS: Re: NTP security hole CVE-2013-5211? Message-ID: <86fvo9cu3r.fsf@nine.des.no> In-Reply-To: <52D7A867.7070607@wenks.ch> (Fabian Wenk's message of "Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:37:43 %2B0100") References: <B0F3AA0A-2D23-424B-8A79-817CD2EBB277@FreeBSD.org> <52CEAD69.6090000@grosbein.net> <21199.26019.698585.355699@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> <868uuid7y3.fsf@nine.des.no> <52D7A867.7070607@wenks.ch>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Fabian Wenk <fabian@wenks.ch> writes: > I think it is a bad advice, then ntpd is much nicer to NTP servers > (mainly the NTP Pool), then sntp is. [snip irrelevant details] ntpd is a particular implementation of the NTP protocol and algorithm. SNTP is a protocol. Comparing one to the other is simply meaningless. It is entirely possible to write a well-behaved SNTP client. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86fvo9cu3r.fsf>