Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 10:40:36 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: assar@stacken.kth.se Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/17613: impossible to build FS KLD without kernel source Message-ID: <4781.991989636@critter> In-Reply-To: Your message of "08 Jun 2001 10:32:26 %2B0200." <5ld78f74o5.fsf@assaris.sics.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <5ld78f74o5.fsf@assaris.sics.se>, assar@stacken.kth.se writes: >Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> writes: >> In message <5ly9r3d9q4.fsf@assaris.sics.se>, assar@stacken.kth.se writes: >> >phk@FreeBSD.org writes: >> >> Synopsis: impossible to build FS KLD without kernel source >> >> >> >> State-Changed-From-To: open->closed >> >> State-Changed-By: phk >> >> State-Changed-When: Wed Jun 6 13:39:10 PDT 2001 >> >> State-Changed-Why: >> >> It is belived that this is not the direction we want to take. >> > >> >Which is then the direction that we want to take? >> >> We don't want to check in generated files. We have more than enough >> trouble with that as it is with the syscalls.master derived stuff. > >I guess I really wanted to ask if being able to build KLDs without >kernel source is something we should be aiming for, and if so, what >direction to take for doing that. To my knowledge that is not a goal. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4781.991989636>