Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 14:41:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: Jack Rusher <jar@integratus.com>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SANs, disks, & devfs Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10007241440340.15581-100000@semuta.feral.com> In-Reply-To: <7888.964474163@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Well, that's why I rolled it out here - to get a taste test. I'll do a prototype- maybe in a week or so- and then announce some diffs and we'll see whether it causes a group gag reflex then. On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <Pine.BSF.4.05.10007241419380.15581-100000@semuta.feral.com>, Matthe > w Jacob writes: > > >Again- I think that this and the full devfs is a usable methodology. I still > >would like some feedback as to whether or not linking mount (and mt, e.g.) > >with libcam so I can use device VPD info or WWNs would be just too awful for > >FreeBSD. This way it can be used now, without vinum. > > Sounds awful to me, but I guess it depends a lot on the implementation. > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.10007241440340.15581-100000>