Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 17:00:43 +0100 From: ian j hart <ianjhart@ntlworld.com> To: Jim Zajkowski <jim@jimz.net>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: Scott Long <scott_long@btc.adaptec.com> Subject: Re: problems with ultra320 Message-ID: <200308141700.43482.ianjhart@ntlworld.com> In-Reply-To: <9C410768-CDCE-11D7-B472-000393B4B272@jimz.net> References: <3E8F6DEC.50505@alternatives.ca> <200308061341.52879.ianjhart@ntlworld.com> <9C410768-CDCE-11D7-B472-000393B4B272@jimz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 13 August 2003 9:42 pm, Jim Zajkowski wrote: > On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 8:41 AM, ian j hart wrote: > > On Wednesday 09 April 2003 4:51 am, Scott Long wrote: > >> Sebastien G wrote: > >>> Well, Thank you Scott. > >>> > >>> I set the tag depth to 32 and everything went ok (make buildworld & > >>> installworld) ! Do you think it is a good enough solution to use > >>> this > >>> systeme in production? > >> > >> We've had reports from various Large Corporate Users that lowering the > >> tag depth to 32 results in satisfactory stability for them. YMMV. > > On the side, lowering the tag depth to 32 on a LSI Logic 1030 (Fusion > MPT) seems to have fixed our stability problems as well. > > --Jim My (dump and) restore still fell over at -N 32, but 31 was okay. The drives are now in production. but since it's the holidays, there's no load. -- ian j hart Quoth the raven, bite me! Salem Saberhagen (Episode LXXXI: The Phantom Menace)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200308141700.43482.ianjhart>