Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2011 03:56:12 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Another Phoronix article Message-ID: <AANLkTinU8WNS02Duy7RXQNRAG-%2BW=tV_GzMQuNx%2BdBm6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimObjkqf%2Bp41zCvtY=dOYR%2B9KGbHBaMb_y7B7Hq@mail.gmail.com> References: <igasbc$3o8$1@dough.gmane.org> <AANLkTimObjkqf%2Bp41zCvtY=dOYR%2B9KGbHBaMb_y7B7Hq@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9 January 2011 03:30, Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >> In summary: very varied results, some are expected (low parallel write >> small IOPS for FreeBSD), some are not (apparently the BSDs have a monopo= ly >> on high-performance gzip :) ). > > I think might have read the graph backwards or I'm misinterpreting your > statement.=C2=A0 The BSD's have a monopoly on low performance gzip meanin= g they > aren't as fast as the Linux counterparts. You're right. Which is interesting - it isn't a (simple) compiler difference since DragonflyBSD has gcc 4.4 also. > That's not much a fs benchmark Yes, they keep ignoring that remark.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTinU8WNS02Duy7RXQNRAG-%2BW=tV_GzMQuNx%2BdBm6>