Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 29 May 2013 21:34:08 +0200
From:      John Marino <freebsdml@marino.st>
To:        Jeremy Messenger <mezz.freebsd@gmail.com>
Cc:        Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org>, "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org>, Kenta Suzumoto <kentas@hush.com>
Subject:   Re: The vim port needs a refresh
Message-ID:  <51A65830.3040904@marino.st>
In-Reply-To: <CADLFttfQ=58aJKY4RPRhRhK4RxcECAra4ObFMMbAknso-8=SJw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20130524212318.B967FE6739@smtp.hushmail.com> <CADLo83_AgAH0fARvtoYYmw5UEf7%2B3nEEs6U%2B6%2BhY8r0MbTkWFw@mail.gmail.com> <CADLFtte5-hEoyvSgtUe5K-uO05rj=jE5ro2xujQcjD8PVA3rmw@mail.gmail.com> <CADLo83_xF=HbE0pqLh0pyGwWh=R-7aMKinLUGyBjmNs_Wx9EZw@mail.gmail.com> <CADLFttfQ=58aJKY4RPRhRhK4RxcECAra4ObFMMbAknso-8=SJw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/29/2013 21:28, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>
> Fix the OPTIONS first and I will accept it in my ports. Pretty simple.
> Since I don't like OPTIONS, so I am not required to fix it. If you do
> really want OPTIONS to be added in my port then please fix it.
>
> Although, I have lost in track of which bugs have been fixed in
> OPTIONS. I know one important bug is:
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2013-April/083035.html

Do any of your ports defer setting of PKGNAMEPREFIX?
In other words, is your stance on principle or does this bug actually 
affect you?

> As same as with the LICENSE. I will not add in my ports until he
> writes document of it. But I will accept the patch of it though. Well,
> again, I might be out of date but I seem still can't find it in the
> porter handbook as today.

I thought LICENSE was totally optional anyway....

John



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51A65830.3040904>