Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 09:51:12 +0200 From: Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@digiware.nl> To: Anish <akgupt3@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD virtualization <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org>, Neel Natu <neel@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: bhyve: svm (amd-v) update Message-ID: <537C5AF0.7070403@digiware.nl> In-Reply-To: <CALnRwMTH=x58VWp731zrbpck5x33VN4AwY85soVfbNvi4m6jNw@mail.gmail.com> References: <53748481.8010108@FreeBSD.org> <CALnRwMRpwc=DHib%2BeooftCkSP_K6XtVuR11AceDYju=mMBE2%2Bw@mail.gmail.com> <537BC30C.4070208@digiware.nl> <CALnRwMTH=x58VWp731zrbpck5x33VN4AwY85soVfbNvi4m6jNw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2014-05-21 6:55, Anish wrote: > Hi Willem, > > > I patch against bhyve_SVM, because in the later case I get > complaints that > This patch is to sync bhyve_svm project branch with HEAD @263780, so you > have to first merge HEAD to bhyve_svm. It will prompt you to resolve > conflict in amdv.c, you should accept the changes that are in bhyve_svm > and then apply the patch. bhyve HEAD exposed vlapic > related interfaces along with some other changes, this patch will enable > vlapic interfaces for SVM. I'd be interested in the vlapic to if that helps the speed. But you can help me a lot if you give me the SVN commands to do what you described above. I can fetch a clean bhyve_svm brach, but that is as far as my svn goes. I'll see if I can get my patches in as well. Thanx, --WjW > > Thanks and regards, > Anish > > > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@digiware.nl > <mailto:wjw@digiware.nl>> wrote: > > On 15-5-2014 17:56, Anish wrote: > > Hi Andriy, > > Thanks for your interest in SVM port of bhyve. I do have patch > to sync it > > to > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=263780(3/26). If > > patches looks good to you, we can submit it. I have been testing > it on > > Phenom box which lacks some of newer SVM features. > > I don't quite understand against what this patch is? > > Do I run it over head, to get SVM code into head? > Or do I patch against bhyve_SVM, because in the later case I get > complaints that > fatal error: 'vlapic_priv.h' file not found > > # locate vlapic_priv.h > /usr/srcs/head/sys/amd64/vmm/io/vlapic_priv.h > > So I'm guessing that is against head. > But last time I looked at head, more than just the interrupt stuff was > missing.... > > --WjW > > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?537C5AF0.7070403>