Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 14:20:17 +0200 From: "Massimo Lusetti" <mlusetti@gmail.com> To: "Palle Girgensohn" <girgen@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org, Ronald Klop <ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org>, David Sledge <dsledge@appriss.com>, Sergey Matveychuk <sem@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Will eclipse32 be committed before ports freeze? (pr ports/102993) Message-ID: <a6647e120610030520ke6e36e5oa68259052461fa90@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <D79CE29A2D7C0861E8B60CD4@rambutan.pingpong.net> References: <op.tggfg2qm8527sy@guido.klop.ws> <4518BED7.3050104@FreeBSD.org> <45197263.50505@appriss.com> <D79CE29A2D7C0861E8B60CD4@rambutan.pingpong.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/3/06, Palle Girgensohn <girgen@freebsd.org> wrote: > I agree that we don't need a repo copy, but I would like to go one step > further; we don't need two different versions of eclipse in the ports tree. > > There are about two dozen ports that rely on eclipse. Most of them can > probably easily be upgraded to work with eclispe-3.2. I'd prefer updating > the ports, and updating eclipse to 3.2. > > What do you think? That would be great. -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a6647e120610030520ke6e36e5oa68259052461fa90>